19 March 2013

On Jim Phillips



I was wrong.

This time last year I wrote Jim Phillips showed “his chops” when he ignored the squeaky wheels for change and retained Bill Carmody for the 2012-13 season.  No.  In retrospect I can now see that I was beguiled by a man who is more interested in furthering his own future than in doing what he believes is in the best interest of Northwestern athletics.

Before all you Jim Phillips acolytes fire up the venomous emails about shooting messengers with grinding axes and what not please re-read the previous sentence for two keys words.  I even italicized them for you overzealous vigilantes who may be lacking in the reading comprehension department.

He believes.  On March 16, 2013 Jim Phillips fired Coach Carmody.  Why?  Some have suggested ulterior motives, but we are not cynical enough to think the decision was anything other than because he believes he can hire a better man for the job. 

This isn’t about whether he is right or wrong in that opinion.  My hubris would need to be at least the size of Jim Phillips’ to say the dude is flat out wrong for firing Carmody.  I am a big enough person to admit that there is a chance--as small as it may be--that Phillips is right in his judgment.

To get back on track the point of this blog post is to point out what these events say about the makeup of one Dr Phillips.  To me I can’t help but conclude that Dr Jim Phillips is a charlatan who has beguiled me and most NU alums into thinking he’s after their school’s best interests when it is first and foremost about Jim Phillips and his career and, oh yeah, he’ll try to do what's good for his employer when the situation allows.  Hell he has even hoodwinked his peers since I saw today that he is among five finalists for AD of the year.  With that kind of success we can only expect more of the same from Dr Jim until there are enough people paying attention to him and his history.

Am I crazy?  Am I really just bitter about the reality that there will never be a Carmody Court and lashing out at the beloved Great Wizard, Dr Jim Phillips, who strangely has operated behind the men’s basketball scenes for the entirety of his tenure while closely and visibly tending most other NU sports?  Or maybe we’re just naïve in our expectations that an AD should do his job no matter what.  Read on for yourself and draw your own conclusions:

Dr J: As I said during my press conference, in the end my decision to fire Bill Carmody wasn’t about this particular season.  It was about the last 13 years.

CC:  At this time last year weren’t the last 12 years good enough to keep Bill on the payroll?

Dr J: At the conclusion of every season and for every sport I complete a timely and comprehensive review of the season.  As you well know I completed that process last year for Bill and held a press conference announcing Bill would be retained.  Part of that evaluation included the performance over the prior 11 years.

CC: In other words the difference between the two reviews was the 2012-13 season.

Dr J: Uh... That’s not the full story.  As I said at the press conference, we were down to one year on the contract, I didn’t think an extension was warranted, and only one year remaining would hurt recruiting.

CC: OK.  Fair enough.  So what you are really saying is that you weren’t willing to extend Bill’s contract, even if only for just one more year, on the basis of the 13 years.  Did I get that right?

Dr J: I don’t disagree.

CC: OK.  Then what would it have taken to warrant an extension?

Dr J: Again.  As I said last year we no longer use internal benchmarks for this program.  The training wheels are off and athletic success matters.  If we were preparing for our trip to Auburn Hills, or even if it were Dayton, we would not be sitting down to this hypothetical interview in your head.  By the way I wasn’t sworn in on the Holy Bible.  I’m not saying that I’m fibbing here.

CC:  Your attempts to divert attention will not work here.  Essentially it was NCAAs or bust this year then?

Dr J: It would’ve been tough to can the guy after winning the NIT, and I might’ve lost some sleep over a loss in the finals at MSG.  I do love NYC and Broadway, but you’re not far off. 

CC: Didn’t we learn from WWI that ultimatums were a bad idea?

Dr J: You’re comparing this situation to The Great War?  I think we’re done here.

CC:  You’re right.  Let’s cut to the chase.  How could you possibly hold Bill to something “not far off” from NCAAs or bust given all of the personnel losses to his team this year?  Need I go into the detail?

Dr J:  Please don’t.

CC:  JerShon Cobb.  Best guy in practice and most highly acclaimed recruit on the team.  Suspended one year for undisclosed reasons.  Why are you smiling Sir?

Dr J: Am I?

CC: Yes you are.  Sanjay Lumpkin.  In preseason practice the most promising of the seven freshman including the redshirts.  First can’t play because of mono.  Then redshirted for injury.

Dr J: Yes.  Poor Sanjay.  No one wants to see a kid go through mono.  I know from personal experience.  My freshman year at coll

CC: Drew Crawford.  2nd Team Big 10 last year.  Second highest returning league scorer.  Senior leader.  Shut down in non-conference to get a medical redshirt.  You’re smiling again Jim.

Dr J: Was I again?  Sorry you just reminded of a dinner I had with Morty the night after Bill broke that news to me.  Of course I called up Danny to express my sympathies.  And Drew as well. He had put so much effort in during the offseason to get ready for his NBA push.  You have no idea how hard these kids work.

CC: Yes.  I know Sir.  Jared Swopshire.  Glue guy from a winning program and X-factor for wins/losses.  He goes down halfway through the B1G season and NU goes winless thereafter.

Dr J: Yeah, I was starting to sweat after that 4-6 start conference start despite all those other losses, but I knew Bill had no chance after Jared went down.  Did I just say that out loud? 

CC: Yes.

Dr J: Can I strike that from the record?

CC: No.

Dr J: There is no official record!  Jokes on you fool!

CC:  Sir.  Please. Need I go on? 

Dr J: Look it.  Clearly Bill had no chance to make the NCAAs this year with all the adversity his team faced.  And I feel so bad for those young men.  It’s so tough to lose games with all the hard work you put in year round.  Have you ever played intercollegiate sports at the highest level?  I haven’t, but these young men have a bond you and I will never understand, and each loss takes a serious toll as they don’t want to let down their peers or their coach.  Whom they all revered by the way.  Which is what made this all so tough.

CC:  I appreciate your frankness here, and I am sure this season was very tough on the team.

Dr J: No problem.  I really do love those kids.  Honestly.  Anyway what was I talking about. . . Right.  It was a raw deal for Bill this year, but 13 years is a really long time to go without making the NCAAs.  Where else besides Northwestern could a coach be employed for that long without making the Dance?  The Ivy League?  Sure but this is the Big Leagues.

CC: If you really felt that way then what difference is there between 0-12 on NCAAs and 0-13?  Is there a difference?

Dr J:  Look.  There isn’t a difference.  But, I was willing to give Bill one more shot.  He’s a good guy, classy, he was on a good run by Northwestern standards, and he had two years left on the contract.  So what's the downside here, right?  I leveled with Bill last year and told him the deal.  I felt I owed him one more season.  That’s fair right?

CC: Well…

Dr J: Put yourself in my shoes.  Let’s say you weren’t in the tank for Bill and wanted someone who could create some buzz around the program like Fitz does.  You have no idea how important that is for a place like Northwestern; it's what has been holding back this program for far too long.  Could you really have gotten rid of him last year when he was coming off four NITs, one more than the entire NIT history of the school prior to Bill, not to mention the first 20 win seasons in school history, back-to-back?  Not many care that he won a few games in the NIT, but some do.  What would you do?

CC: If I really believed as you do that Bill was not right for the program?  Then yes I would’ve fired him last year.  That’s my job as AD.  To do what I think is right for the program.  Not what is best for me or what is practical.  It takes some backbone to be a leader.

Dr J: I showed backbone this year.  Look at those fools on the message boards.  I know you’re just gritting your teeth here and now.

CC: No.  You took the opportunity of an injury riddled season to make a move.  That’s a coward’s way out.

Dr J: Hold on there fella.  I knew you were pissed about this decision, and I can understand that, but let’s not get personal.  Frankly, I wanted to fire the guy back when I arrived but couldn’t because I was new to the job and his buddy was still president.  I’ve been waiting five years to do this.  Some would call me a saint!

CC: I wouldn’t.  I’d say you’re even more negligent in doing your duties than I thought.  Just stop before you dig your hole any deeper.  I had respect for you before this dialogue, but I know better now.  You’re not an exemplary AD.  I may live in an ideal world, but to me an AD should DO HIS JOB and make the tough decisions for the betterment of his university no matter how difficult, no matter how unpopular, no matter how damaging it might be for his career.   

Dr J: Talk to me in 20 years when you grow up and understand how the real world works.

Believe what you want, but this rant isn’t about the decision to fire Carmody.  At worst it’s just an attempt to blow off some steam for being fooled by Jim Phillips this time last year.  But as they say fool me once shame on you…  We see you now Dr Jim.

We bloggers really aren’t even dyed-in-the-wool Carmody fans.  Yes we think he’s a good coach.  Yes we think he should be NU’s coach next year.  But we are Northwestern fans first and foremost and will in all likelihood rally around the new guy.  For those of you who are slow on the uptake the name of this blog was tongue-in-cheek and started in fun to be the “Win” to firebillcarmody’s “Wang”. 

01 February 2013

Preview: Purdue at NORTHWESTERN



Saturday's game at The Welsh is a battle of equals and a must win if NU is to make a run at a fifth consecutive NIT.  Purdue is 4-4 in B1G and NU is 3-6 but those records are misleading.  NU has gone through the meat grinder while Purdue has most of its grinding ahead.
 
Don’t take our word for it.  Kenpom has NU at #89 (the same as at the start of the season! But we digress) and Purdue #78.  NU is predicted to win by three points and has a 60% probability of winning. 


Similarities
  • Purdue has been poor away from WL (Clemson excepted); NU has been poor at WR (Minny excepted)
  • Both teams are struggling on offense and showing sporadic improvement on defense.
  • Neither team can shoot free throws.
  • Both teams are poor at grabbing defensive rebounds.


Contrasts
  • It was news to us that Purdue is B1G’s most interior-oriented team.  2pters account for highest percentage of points which is partly a reflection of their propensity to effectively crash the offensive glass (#3/12).
  • NU likes to jack 3 pters.  Don’t be surprised to see NU:Purdue attempts about 2:1.
  • Purdue can block shots and NU gets shots blocked often.
  • NU gets to the line often making poor FT shooting a bigger problem.
  • NU likes to steal the ball while Purdue does not.  This is good for NU because Purdue is turnover prone.
 
Skinny on Purdue Players
  • Byrd can shoot from distance.  Can’t leave him.  Terone Johnson is so-so.
  • Hammons is inconsistent.  Contest his shot and he is likely to miss even from close range.

Keys to Game
1.  Alex Olah staying between Hammons and the rim. 
2.  Stay in Byrd’s hip pocket.
3.  Win the turnover battle
4.  Drive and dish

We'd also like to see NU try to crash the offensive boards early.  If Purdue burns NU for fast break points then abandon that strategy.

25 January 2013

B1G Power Rankings

Yes.  The season turn around has inspired us to dust off the power rankings.  How long will it last? Stupid question.   Let's get to it.

1.  Michigan.  Trey Burke = tres bien.
2.  Indiana.  Cody Zeller = gaudy baller.
3.  Michigan St. Overachieving
4.  Minnesota.  Mbawke = Bantu for dominant.
5.  Wisconsin.  Bo knows coaching.
6.  Ohio St.   Thomas misses Sully.
7.  Iowa.  Poor man's Indiana 2011-12.
8.  Illinois.  Shots will start falling again.
9.  Purdue.  Doing it with defense.
10.  NU.  Doing it with defense?!?!
11.  Nebraska.  Saturday roadkill.
12.  Penn St.  Key injury + no depth = O-fer?

On the Big Ten Geeks

Rant/

These guys need to either put an asterisk on their moniker or change it altogether.  Because to put Big Ten in the name connotes a fair and balanced approached to all things Big Ten, but their treatment for Northwestern is far from that approach.  When they do happen to mention Northwestern on occasion it is typically dismissive in tone and with negative bias.  Maybe it's the Illini coming out of them, but we have to wonder what they have against NU since the series was rather one-sided until the past few years.

Take this season for example.  Hardly any mention of NU except to say better luck next year and oh BTW Drew Crawford got hurt so Carmody may never get over the hump BLAH BLAH BLAH.  Color us SHOCKED that they didn't even mention the NU victory at Illinois last week.  Newsworthy game?  Check. Illinois bias shining through?  Check.

Finally NU did get mention in the aftermath of the victory of the Gophers.  But in typical BTG fashion it was more an indictment of Minnesota than any praise for NU.  In fact they went so far as to say 8-10 won't get the job done this year so cool the NCAAs bubble talk you silly purple koolade drinkers.  This is a ridiculous statement that conveniently glosses over a big road win at Baylor and a neutral court tournament title not to mention two wins over ranked opponents.  Last year NU learned that 8-10 wasn't good enough despite no bad losses because it lacked the big wins.  This year is different for NU which has already tallied some big wins to balance off a bad loss or two.  Anti-NU bias?  Check.  Lack of NCAA Selection Criteria Expertise?  Check.

Look it.  We realize that NU is far from the top of the list when it comes to Big Ten intrigue.  The NCAAs drought.  The B1G standings.  The small fan base.  Etc.   But NU is due more and positive attention from a purported Big Ten-oriented blog.  The past four years were decent (by NU standards), and the storyline of Carmody doing good work to rescue a season at risk due to injuries and suspensions is an easy writeup.  The more we see of BTG's coverage of NU the more apparent becomes their bias.  We know all about bias on this blog, but then again we don't purport to be an even-handed B1G blog.

/Rant

24 January 2013

NORTHWESTERN 55 Minnesota 48 (F)

That was most certainly a Carmody Court kinda night.  Oh yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh.  Payback is a beeeeeeyotchhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.  Ain't that right Tubby????????????????

Northwestern (12-8, 3-4) took down kenpom #7 Minnesota last night.  Things started out ok for NU with barometer Jared Swopshire going off early on the offensive end.  Despite the nice start the game started to get away from NU for most of the first half.  Just like the game up in Minneapolis the Gophers enforced a no fly zone around both backboards.  And the tempo was too fast for Northwestern.  Yet somehow the first half ended with a beautiful Tre Demps step-back J that shrank the NU deficit to just three points.  Games like that usually have a way of the ending with the outplayed team storming back to victory, and that was most certainly the case here.

If you would be so kind as to allow us to ignore NU's continued woes from the charity stripe (please!!!!!!!!)  we shall say that the second half was exquisite.  During a pivotal 8+ minute stretch that began with about 13 minutes to play NU outscored Minnesota 18-4.  This huge run was sparked by Coach Carmody masterfully changing defenses between the 1-3-1 and man-to-man.  This switching defense took the starch out of the Gopher offense.  Suddenly NU points off of Gopher turnovers were abundant, and the Minnesota advantage on the glass mysteriously and miraculously vanished.  Perhaps NU was the fortunate recipient of a disproportionate number of rebounds caroming into NU hands, but we think it was more than that.  The way we see it NU's defense knocked Minnesota woozy which took the starch out of their rebounding aggressiveness.

Tre Demps did not set the world on fire in his first start, but he picked his moments to make his mark.  The first half ending shot mentioned above.  Swishing a high-arcing rushed three point shot with the shot clock running down.  Making 3-4 free throws -- a minor miracle for NU last night.

And this game was a glaring example of Carmody Court's unearthed trend that the losing team from the first game nearly always closes the gap in the rematch.  In the first game NU lost 69-51; in the rematch NU climbed all the way back and then some (an amazing 25 point swing on net).

Next up is NU's first trip to the Land O' Corn for a B1G battle.  Kenpom has installed NU as a three point favorite.  Past seasons would suggest a heightened anxiety with NU playing as a road favorite, but this is a brave new world.  NU is an outstanding 3-1 on the road.  NU won at Penn State under similar circumstances.  Nebraska has a first year coach, and teams with relatively new coaches tend to have trouble with NU's schemes (see: Chambers, Patrick and McCarffery, Fran).  And as the old adage goes good defense doesn't take nights off, and NU has been playing good defense these past few games.

23 January 2013

This is a Carmody Court kinda night

We get to see if starting demps was another of our bonehead moments or a stroke of genius.  We also get to see if the trend that the losing team in the rematch closes the efficiency gap continues to hold.

Popcorn ready!  Lessgo.

18 January 2013

Northwestern 68 ILLINOIS 54 (F)

That was...errrr...unexpected.  Yes.  There were signs that the Illini were entering an all-too-familiar B1G swoon.  In that respect there was a fighters chance for Northwestern.  The listless manner by which NU turtled its way to a 20 point loss in the prior game against Iowa at the Welsh gave no hint that NU was in a fighting mood.

The tone was set early as four different players knocked down bombs on their first attempts.  Most noteworthy were streaky Marcotullio and Swopshire making their three pointers.  Suffice it to say that if Swop is making his threes it's going to be a competitive night for NU.  If Little Al follows suit and actually fills his marksman role then watch out!

NU played outstanding defense throughout.  The I-L-L---I-N-I offense was clicking on no cylinders and made it easy to be defended.  Hello?  Motion?  Passing?  These appear to be either foreign or outdated concepts to new Illinois head coach Mr Clean.

Our eyebrows raised in the second half when the lineup was primarily:  Sobo, Demps, Hearn, Swop, and Turner.  About a month ago after Crawford went out for the season for shoulder  surgery we proposed nearly this very lineup save Olah in the place of Turner.  You're almost there with the winning formula Coach.  Better late than never.

Next up is an overrated Indiana team coming to Evanston on Sunday.  NU has about a 12% chance ala kenpom, but we figure maybe a one in four chance since Tom Crean is tactically clueless against NU's schemes.  Indiana's talent will likely carry the day for the Hoosiers, but if the seniors are in a fighting mood again (Reggie Hearn scored 20 at Illinois for a repeat stellar performance at Ass Hall) then who knows.  Strangely enough NU has played better on the road than at home this year which is an odd trend that needs undoing (on the home front only --knock on wood).

10 January 2013

MINNESOTA 69 Northwestern 51

Northwestern tried the stall offense.  Led 13-11 at the 4:00 mark.  We were mostly bored as the game wasn't much different than a women's basketball game.  We were also a tiny bit excited about that slow down BS actually working and leading to an upset.

Then  Austin Hollins heated up from distance.  The lead grew unmanageable.  Carmody went to the 1-3-1 as a last ditch effort to salvage the upset bid.  Hollins torched NU some more.  The rout was on.

We hate to pile on poor Kale Abrahamson, but he gets tossed around like a rag doll on defense.  We still think he needs to be benched in favor of our man Tre Demps.  Or even Cerina to help counter physically imposing teams like Minnesota.

Anywho....tonight we get to see NU play one of the few B1G games this year that NU could win.  And it's on the road.  If Penn State easily handles NU tonight then the circling vultures will begin to land even though Carmody is still alive and kicking.  The vultures have waited patiently to get their meal, and patience is at its end for them.   It is sad to see the lack of perspective, but we've grown to accept it among fans more generally and Coach Carmody's detractors more specifically.  C'est la vie.